<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sherwin Arnott &#187; global warming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sherwinarnott.org/tag/global-warming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sherwinarnott.org</link>
	<description>Media, Design &#38; Epistemology...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 23:53:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Russ Campbell, Tim Ball and climate change (I mean global warming)</title>
		<link>http://www.sherwinarnott.org/branding/russ-campbell-tim-ball-and-climate-change-i-mean-global-warming/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sherwinarnott.org/branding/russ-campbell-tim-ball-and-climate-change-i-mean-global-warming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 16:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sherwin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russ Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Ball]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sherwinarnott.org/?p=1738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Media coverage of global warming, ahem, has been divisive. If you are a busy person trying to understand global warming, you might get a little confused by reading the National Post, the Calgary Herald, or Russ Campbell's blog. It's partly because of the lack of critical discourse about many self-proclaimed climate experts' credentials...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>I wrote about my personal experience of <a title="Making Tim Ball" href="http://www.sherwinarnott.org/advertising-and-branding/making-tim-ball/">Tim Ball </a>quite some time ago. I was recently perusing right wing blogs when I tripped over this <a title="Russ Campbell on Tim Ball" rel="nofollow" href="http://russ-campbell.blogspot.com/2010/02/dr-tim-ball-and-truth-about-climate.html">post by Russ Campbell</a> in which he overstates Tim Ball&#8217;s credentials. This is a common ploy and we&#8217;ve probably all been guilty of doing this in some fashion or another. After all, if someone says something we disagree with, we generally try to discredit them or at least play down their expertise. And if someone says something we agree with, then will try to affirm their opinion.</h3>
<p>It&#8217;s a terrible public relations and advertising tendency. I would also speculate that on a more basic psychological level, it&#8217;s also a common human behaviour that we utilize almost instinctively. It&#8217;s not exactly rational and I think it probably happens more often and more subtly than most would care to admit.</p>
<p>But sometimes it happens not so subtly.</p>
<p>To underscore the point, Russ Campbell has several posts generally denying human caused global warming. So he loves Tim Ball. So he tries to affirm Tim Ball&#8217;s status as an expert in the field, claiming that, among other things, &#8220;Dr. Ball has the <em>bona fides</em> to talk about global warming.&#8221; The <a title="removing PR from climate change! Yeah!" href="http://www.desmogblog.com/">DeSmogBlog</a>’s goal is to remove public relations spin from the climate change debate so they have a different take on <a title="Tim Ball and his credentials" href="http://www.desmogblog.com/node/1272">Tim Ball&#8217;s credentials</a>. Tim Ball is in the employ of those whose short term fiscal interests are diametrically opposed to making policy changes to help mitigate human caused global warming. Oi. But Russ Campbell never mentioned that.</p>
<p>It is interesting that Russ Campbell quotes Wikipedia on Tim Ball. But there is currently (at the time of publication) no entry on Tim Ball. I can imagine that this entry has been very controversial and the Wikipedia community can be very tenacious about this sort of thing. I am a little curious why the page was deleted. The pages on both <a title="Climate change by Wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_change">climate change</a> and <a title="Global warming by Wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming">global warming</a> are very good. <sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-1738-1' id='fnref-1738-1'>1</a></sup> Russ Campbell doesn&#8217;t mention these either.</p>
<div class='footnotes'>
<div class='footnotedivider'></div>
<ol>
<li id='fn-1738-1'>And by &#8220;very good&#8221; I mean simply that they seem to generally affirm my opinion. Comedy. <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-1738-1'>&#8617;</a></span></li>
</ol>
</div>
<p><!-- PHP 5.x --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sherwinarnott.org/branding/russ-campbell-tim-ball-and-climate-change-i-mean-global-warming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CO2 Now has widgets</title>
		<link>http://www.sherwinarnott.org/cool-websites/co2-now-has-widgets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sherwinarnott.org/cool-websites/co2-now-has-widgets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 00:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sherwin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cool Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atmospheric CO2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sherwinarnott.org/?p=1609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CO2NOW.org is a neat resource specializing in helping humans simply know how much CO2 is currently in the Earth&#8217;s atmosphere. It kind of reminds me of a thermostat. We should all have a carbon-o-stat for our earth. And it should be set for 350 PPM or lower. :( Check out http://co2now.org/Current-CO2/CO2-Widget/ to find an assortment [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><a title="cool website tracking carbon dioxide" href="http://co2now.org/">CO2NOW.org</a> is a neat resource specializing in helping humans simply know how much CO2 is currently in the Earth&#8217;s atmosphere. It kind of reminds me of a thermostat. We should all have a carbon-o-stat for our earth. And it should be set for 350 PPM or lower. :(</h3>
<p>Check out <a title="widgets at co2now" href="http://co2now.org/Current-CO2/CO2-Widget/">http://co2now.org/Current-CO2/CO2-Widget/ </a>to find an assortment of widgets that you too can post on your website. Yes, they have a WordPress widget.</p>
<p><!-- Start of Current CO2 Widget--></p>
<p><a href="http://co2now.org/"><img src="http://co2now.org/images/stories/widgets/co2_widget_tyndall_200.png" border="0" alt="Current CO2 level in the atmosphere" width="200" height="300" /></a></p>
<p><!-- End of Current CO2 Widget--><!-- PHP 5.x --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sherwinarnott.org/cool-websites/co2-now-has-widgets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Freedom of scientific speech</title>
		<link>http://www.sherwinarnott.org/politics/freedom-of-scientific-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sherwinarnott.org/politics/freedom-of-scientific-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sherwin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Cuddy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ayn Rand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evil-overlord]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraser Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Koch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Weissenberger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Mullins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[truth and fairness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sherwinarnott.org/?p=1077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One problem I have with so many conservatives and libertarians is their attachment to their untested (and often inconsistent) theories and ideas. To be fair, we&#8217;re all probably a little challenged by science and research that refutes our own beliefs. But when I followed a link to this article by the Guardian,1 I suddenly had [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><span class="dropcap">O</span>ne problem I have with so many conservatives and libertarians is their attachment to their untested (and often inconsistent) theories and ideas. To be fair, we&#8217;re all probably a little challenged by science and research that refutes our own beliefs. But when I followed a link to <a title="Government of Canada muzzling scientists" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/mar/18/climate-change-canada">this article by the Guardian</a>,<sup class='footnote'><a href='#fn-1077-1' id='fnref-1077-1'>1</a></sup> I suddenly had some recurring bad thoughts about folks that are science-challenged:</h3>
<blockquote><p>Canada&#8217;s climate researchers are being  muzzled, their funding slashed, research stations closed, findings  ignored and advice on the critical issue of the century unsought by  Prime Minister Stephen Harper&#8217;s government&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>Harper is the guy that once claimed that global warming was nothing but a socialist conspiracy after all. And Harper is from Calgary. But, in defense of Calgary, there are many scientists that live there and there are even a few that don&#8217;t work for Big Oil. I guess that&#8217;s why Harper decided to <a title="Harpers Muzzle on scientists" href="http://thetyee.ca/Mediacheck/2010/03/25/HarpersMuzzle/">just muzzle them</a>. A scientist from Edmonton, <a title="Scientists must be free to speak" href="http://www.ottawacitizen.com/technology/Scientists+must+free+speak/2699836/story.html">writing in the Ottawa Citizen</a>, said this:</p>
<blockquote><p>It is clear that muzzling under the Harper government is the most  oppressive in the history of federal government science. Incredibly,  some of the most eminent scientists in Canada have been forbidden to  speak publicly on scientific matters where they are recognized as world  experts, ranging from climate change to pollution of lakes and rivers.  Instead, the public is referred to media-savvy spin doctors, who usually  know very little about the science of these topics, spouting the party  line.</p></blockquote>
<p>The report that got this all started was written by the Climate Action Network and can<a title="Troubling Evidence: The Harper Government’s Approach to Climate Science Research in Canada" href="http://www.climateactionnetwork.ca/e/news/2010/release/index.php?WEBYEP_DI=18"> be found here</a>. There is much that is interesting in this report and one detail that I found particularly  interesting was the fact that Harper has appointed climate change skeptics to the boards of two super important granting bodies: NSERC and CFI. So just to explain how this works, students in Universities that are working at the graduate level in the sciences are funded by granting agencies like NSERC. In fact, I believe the National Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) is responsible for the funding of all of the PhD scientists I know. And NSERC has the difficult position of <em>selecting</em> and <em>denying</em> applications for funding. Not everyone&#8217;s research gets funded and not all research gets the green light. So the significance of Harper&#8217;s appointments to the board, is very very real.</p>
<p>One of these appointments is Mark Mullins. Mark Mullins was the Executive Director of the Fraser Institute for four years.</p>
<p>Another one of the appointments (to CFI) was John Weissenberger. He&#8217;s a geologist from Calgary who worked in oil and gas for twenty years. He&#8217;s actually a friend of the evil-overlord himself and was a chief of staff for the evil-overlord&#8217;s government. The author of the Climate Action Network report, Andrew Cuddy, took the time to include a quote by John Weissenberger and I&#8217;ll sign off by quoting the quote. But first, you should know that Weissenberger didn&#8217;t write the following soundbite alone. He was joined by George Koch, who I&#8217;m assuming is from the <a title="Koch Family politics" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koch_Industries#Political_activity">Koch family</a> of Koch Oil. The Koch family are all pious followers of Ayn Rand even, I believe, requiring that their employees and executives read Rand&#8217;s books. The Koch&#8217;s, in short, are libertarians and conservatives.</p>
<blockquote><p>“[T]he great weakening of the Stalinist intellectual monument of global warming theory continues in regular increments.” — George Koch (from a blog published jointly with Weissenberger), September 13, 2008</p></blockquote>
<div class='footnotes'>
<div class='footnotedivider'></div>
<ol>
<li id='fn-1077-1'>Link provided by the Tyee: <a title="Harpers Muzzle, by the Tyee" href="http://thetyee.ca/Mediacheck/2010/03/25/HarpersMuzzle/">http://thetyee.ca/Mediacheck/2010/03/25/HarpersMuzzle/</a> <span class='footnotereverse'><a href='#fnref-1077-1'>&#8617;</a></span></li>
</ol>
</div>
<p><!-- PHP 5.x --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sherwinarnott.org/politics/freedom-of-scientific-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The future of cities</title>
		<link>http://www.sherwinarnott.org/design/the-future-of-cities/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sherwinarnott.org/design/the-future-of-cities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 02:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sherwin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[city states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[making predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nation states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paul saffo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the rise of robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[turing test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sherwinarnott.org/?p=1074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This conversation with Paul Saffo is interesting in part because these two middle age white executives are speaking so nonchalantly about the relative likelihood of nation states breaking up into city states. And don&#8217;t forget about the rise of robots. And don&#8217;t forget about surviving climate change. And what about the cost of housing on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><span class="dropcap">T</span>his conversation with Paul Saffo is interesting in part because these two middle age white executives are speaking so nonchalantly about the relative likelihood of nation states breaking up into city states. And don&#8217;t forget about the rise of robots. And don&#8217;t forget about surviving climate change. And what about the cost of housing on the bay?</h3>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="400" height="264" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="flashvars" value="webhost=fora.tv&amp;clipid=3249&amp;cliptype=clip" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://fora.tv/embedded_player" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="400" height="264" src="http://fora.tv/embedded_player" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" flashvars="webhost=fora.tv&amp;clipid=3249&amp;cliptype=clip"></embed></object><!-- PHP 5.x --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sherwinarnott.org/design/the-future-of-cities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David Suzuki says call PM</title>
		<link>http://www.sherwinarnott.org/online-resources/david-suzukis-wish/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sherwinarnott.org/online-resources/david-suzukis-wish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sherwin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Suzuki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sherwinarnott.org/?p=630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Suzuki says call prime minister Stephen Harper and tell him that Canada needs to show a willingness to cooperate in Copenhagen. And he also says we should record our phone calls on video and then post them to the Suzuki site. So that&#8217;s what we did and we submitted our videos to the Suzuki [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><span class="dropcap">D</span>avid Suzuki says call prime minister Stephen Harper and tell him that Canada needs to show a willingness to cooperate in Copenhagen. And he also says we should record our phone calls on video and then post them to the Suzuki site. So that&#8217;s what we did and we submitted our videos to the Suzuki Foundation beta site: <a title="David Suzuki says call the PM" href="http://beta.davidsuzuki.org/share/call-the-pm/">http://beta.davidsuzuki.org/share/call-the-pm/</a></h3>
<p>I checked today and we&#8217;re currently posted right beside David Suzuki&#8217;s own call to Harper! Can you tell I&#8217;m a fan of David Suzuki?</p>
<p>In case you&#8217;re interested, <a title="Report by Pembina and Suzuki Foundation" href="http://beta.davidsuzuki.org/library/publications/climate-leadership-economic-prosperity/">here is where</a> you can find the report that the Suzuki Foundation co-authored with the Pembina Institute. Let me summarize for you: 1. the current Canadian plan to deal with climate change is not working, 2. there is a way to do something that does work. The report also lays out a detailed and thorough plan but I won&#8217;t summarize that. The idea is that if we change our climate by more than 2°C (or Kelvin) from the pre-industrial levels we&#8217;ll face a harsh reality. To prevent that, industrialized countries need to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions to 25% lower than the 1990 levels. Here&#8217;s the kicker: we need to do it by 2020. But what is amazing about the Suzuki Foundation and the Pembina institute is that they actually show how we can do that, while maintaining a vibrant economy. It requires strong political leadership to do it. So let&#8217;s make that happen, shall we?</p>
<p>P.S. if anyone needs help taking video of their phone call to the PM or posting their video to Youtube, you&#8217;re welcome to contact me, and, time and space depending, I will endeavor to help you.<!-- PHP 5.x --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sherwinarnott.org/online-resources/david-suzukis-wish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.sherwinarnott.org/tag/global-warming/feed/ ) in 1.08290 seconds, on Feb 7th, 2012 at 9:09 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 7th, 2012 at 10:09 pm UTC -->
