@manybothans Gender rolls? I say let a thousand flours bloom. :)
@RodSmelser Yes. Allso politically counter-productive to focus on only some questions. These are deep issues. Which I know you know.
@RodSmelser I got your meaning. :)
@RodSmelser So we’re outraged about a conflict of interest on one res. But we ignore a fundamental failure of law right here. Confusing.
@RodSmelser Right. But land is a bundle of rights under law. And here in BC there is no proper legal basis for those rights…
@RodSmelser Yes, and what if the land we lived on failed to have a legal basis for property rights – what do you think?
@mattgurney Probably “filled that in” mistakenly after reading a bio from the FDD website. You aren’t curious about substantive issues?
@jonkay Very clever jokes. Do you have an earnest response?
@mattgurney But seriously, I wrote the article in earnest. Do you have an earnest response?
FTW Interesting comparison to Godwin’s law: What is a consensus? skepticblog.org/2013/01/03/wha…
@cselley Fair enough. I removed it.
@acoyne Which part? :)
@jonkay Well apparently I got something wrong about you being born in the States. I’ll fix that if that’s the case.
@acoyne FYI I included you in my post about Dinosaur Journalists and Idle No More
@oliveridley You have the best header image on Twitter, by the way.